Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta professional ethics. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta professional ethics. Mostrar todas las entradas

lunes, 7 de abril de 2025

RENTABLE VICTIMS

Some doors don’t open. Others are just part of the trap.


 

Today, I address other women who, like me, have at some point needed to seek help and guidance while facing situations of risk, violence, or any kind of disaster. Friend, open your eyes: there are professionals who live off others' suffering as if it were a fixed income. They disguise it as vocation and cynically dress it in empathy, but what they actually do is settle into your pain and live off it—and off you. They don't come to resolve anything. They come to stay.

In particularly delicate contexts—such as the so-called "gender violence" processes, contentious separations, custody disputes, or institutional violence—these profiles abound. They often present themselves as therapists, psychologists, lawyers, or mediators, but stay alert, as they can take other forms.

They have a great talent for appearing before you as allies, but they operate as managers of your despair. I acknowledge that some genuinely don't know what to do: they simply listen to you describe a situation they professionally lack the knowledge or capacity to resolve. However, they will never admit this, because they need to put bread on their table. Far from helping you by confessing their ignorance and giving you the chance to find someone better, they drag you down further, because their strategies don't work, and their "professional advice" will lead you to disaster.

Others (the fewer) simply have no interest in or desire for you to get out of the problem. Because if they solve it, they lose a client. I couldn't tell you which is worse: the one who can't help you or the one who doesn't want to because a long process means a steady drip of money, and that's what they live on. Practically speaking, both are disastrous.

This is not a metaphor. It's an industry. And it operates with logic similar to that of big pharmaceutical companies: they're not interested in curing you; they're interested in treating you. The cure is the end of the business. Indefinite treatment is the profitable model.

For years, we've debated—in barbecues with friends, over coffee chats—that pharmaceutical companies, apparently, don't aim to eliminate diseases but to make them chronic. That investment in research is more directed at alleviating symptoms than eradicating causes. That curing isn't profitable. And in the offices of many "support" professionals, we can bet they face the same dilemma.

They act perversely. They explain in detail everything that's happening to you. They have technical vocabulary for each stage of your downfall. They explain the effects, the causes, the dynamics. They name each of your fears and even catalog the violences you've suffered or are suffering with scientific and bombastic names. But they don't bring solutions. They don't show exits. There's no plan. Just more analysis, more sessions, more reports. More time and more money.

If you go to a doctor, you expect them to tell you what's wrong, yes, but also what you can do to get better or not die. If you go to a dentist, you don't expect a class on cavities or who discovered orthodontics; you want to know how much a filling or a root canal costs and whether there's a solution or extraction is needed. If your house is sinking or leaking, you don't need a treatise on geology or on the big mistakes you made choosing this or that engineer; you need to know if the foundation can be reinforced and how much it costs. In other words, a professional and objective strategy to resolve what's worrying you.

This is the same. Victims don't want trauma pedagogy or to read books about what's leaving them impoverished and stressed, fearful or isolated. They want a winning strategy. And they can't find it.

And the thing is, many times, the very structure of these professional relationships is another form of abuse. A covert, validated, even prestigious abuse. An abuse that hides behind reports, sessions, diagnostic labels, and symbolic complicity. But abuse, nonetheless. An abuse yet to be named, by the way.

The big problem is that these intermediaries of pain don't just steal your money: they steal your time, hope, and energy. They make you think that what's happening to you is so complex, so specific, and so delicate that only they can explain it to you. But they don't resolve it. Never. Or, being a bit condescending... almost never.

The question is uncomfortable but inevitable: what will they live on if you heal? What will they live on if your child's custody is resolved in three days simply by respecting the child's wishes?

I’ve encountered silences that truly accompany, and discourses that only numb. We are surrounded by the latter. People who, when you come to them with your life falling apart, recommend reading their books on the subject. Or invite you to attend their talks about the very drama you’re living.

It’s time to identify those who are not working for your escape, but for their own permanence. Because a victim doesn’t need an interpreter. She needs a key.
And these people don’t even know where the door is.

Isabel Salas


domingo, 15 de diciembre de 2024

PATOLOGIZAR PARA CALLAR (NOS)

 El cuerpo enferma mientras el expediente psiquiatriza

 


El sistema no escucha lo que le pasa al cuerpo de las madres durante un proceso judicial donde existe la posibilidad de que le quiten a sus hijos, pero lo traduce a su manera.

La madre enfrenta bruxismo, pérdida de muelas, diarreas, insomnio, hipertensión y agotamiento nervioso —signos clásicos de estrés crónico y duelo forzado— el expediente escribe trastornos. El cuerpo habla, el juzgado ignora. No se pregunta qué daño puede producir la separación, sino qué defectos tiene la madre. De hecho, después del arrancamiento de un hijo nadie desde el juzgado se pregunta como están de salud la madre o el hijo.

Así, la violencia institucional no se reconoce como causa.  Y en esa operación, el vínculo se pierde dos veces: primero en la vida, después en el lenguaje.  

Cuando una madre pierde, o lucha por no perder, a sus hijos —sea por vía forzada, judicial o institucional— su cuerpo no “exagera”: reacciona.  El cuerpo grita amenaza sostenida; el juzgado responde con diagnóstico.

Este post no necesita muchas explicaciones, basta ver la lista de que reproduzco a continuación y sacar las propias conclusiones 

1. Patologías reales, documentadas y silenciadas

Estas no son "personalidades problemáticas". Son respuestas fisiológicas y psicosomáticas ante una amenaza prolongada, una pérdida no resuelta y una institucionalidad que castiga el apego.

Sistema nervioso y somatización

  • Insomnio severo o fragmentado

  • Crisis de ansiedad con síntomas físicos

  • Hipervigilancia permanente

  • Fatiga extrema / agotamiento nervioso

Salud bucodental

  • Bruxismo (diurno/nocturno)

  • Pérdida o fractura de piezas dentales

  • Retracción de encías

  • Dolor mandibular crónico (ATM)

Sistema digestivo

  • Diarreas persistentes

  • Colon irritable

  • Náuseas crónicas

  • Gastritis y úlceras

  • Pérdidas o aumentos bruscos de peso

Sistema inmunológico

  • Infecciones recurrentes

  • Caída del cabello

  • Brotes de herpes

  • Agravamiento de enfermedades autoinmunes

Sistema cardiovascular

  • Hipertensión reactiva

  • Taquicardias

  • Dolor torácico funcional

Sistema endocrino y hormonal

  • Amenorrea / alteraciones del ciclo

  • Desregulación tiroidea

  • Síntomas menopáusicos tempranos o intensificados

Dolor físico generalizado

  • Migrañas

  • Contracturas crónicas

  • Fibromialgia o cuadros similares


Es el cuerpo reaccionando a una amenaza que no cesa. Aunque algunos de estos problemas aparecen durante una convivencia violenta,  empeoran cuando se inicia el proceso judicial y aparecen otros. Muchos otros.


2. El expediente: del cuerpo al diagnóstico

Cuando el dolor y el miedo resisten y no se callan, el sistema responde con etiquetas. No se diagnostica el daño, se invalida al sujeto. No se reconoce la violencia institucional, se convierte en patología individual. En definitiva no parecen entender la reacción de una hembra al tratar de quitarle a su cría. Al final, para ellos, cualquiera puede ser madre.

Etiquetas frecuentes (y funcionales):

  • Trastorno límite de la personalidad

  • Rasgos paranoides

  • Trastorno narcisista

  • Trastorno histriónico

  • Psicosis encubierta

  • Depresión “patológica”

  • Ansiedad “desadaptativa”

  • Trastorno oposicionista

  • Trastorno de la personalidad no especificado

Constructos que no necesitan pruebas:

  • “Obsesión con el hijo”

  • “Dependencia emocional”

  • “Fijación patológica”

  • “Dificultad para cooperar”

  • “Rigidez cognitiva”

  • “Victimismo”

  • “Alienación” (cuando conviene)

Estas categorías no requieren pruebas objetivas. 

Se activan cuando la madre no acepta perder el vínculo.

Cada reacción humana se convierte en un defecto psiquiátrico. El cuerpo habla del daño. El expediente borra la causa. Lo primero es consecuencia. Lo segundo, herramienta.

 Madame Bedeau de l'Écochère

 

DIAGNÓSTICOS BLANDOS, CRUELDAD DURA

Diagnóstico o dictamen: cómo se construye una etiqueta Los diagnósticos clínicos formales —los que suenan a manual DSM con esteroides— se su...